Cases 31 - 40 of 199
HOYLE v. CROZIER et al
as 2:2022cv03049
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS AUSTIN HOYLE
Defendant:
PATRICK A. CROZIER, DAVID TYLER, THOMAS SCARPATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEIGER v. CONROY et al
as 2:2022cv02458
Plaintiff:
LAMONT GEIGER
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER TYLOR CONROY, POLICE OFFICER DONALD MAWSON, POLICE OFFICER ALEXANDER MCCHORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWAINSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SWAINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER MANUEL SANTIAGO, OFFICER MICHAEL COHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH, PA
as 2:2022cv01920
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SEARS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
KHALIF SEARS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER DEMETRIUS MONK, POLICE OFFICER PATRICK SABA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. BURNS et al
as 5:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
BRIAN BURNS, JENNIFER EDWARDS, RAUL PINTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. KALTESKI et al
as 5:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
SHELBY TYRONE CLARK and SHELBY TYRONE CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
KENNETH KALTESKI, EMIL SOFIA, LILLIAN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. SRGT. VINGALISS et al
as 2:2021cv04633
Plaintiff:
MUBARAK ALEXANDER
Defendant:
SRGT. VINGALISS, SRGT. HARTMAN, NURSE KRISTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. CAPOZZA
as 2:2021cv04668
Petitioner:
LOUIS ALEXANDER
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook v. Condo et al
as 1:2021cv00361
Defendant:
Michelle Dunn, Justin Brown and Sam Condo
Plaintiff:
Fabian Alexander Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
