Cases 31 - 40 of 25,668
Wesley v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Petitioner:
Christopher Wesley
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sexton v. Bickham et al
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Jinel Sexton
Defendant:
Edward Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2024cv01504
Plaintiff:
Dashone Reynolds
Defendant:
James LeBlanc and Travis Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U'Din v. Rester et al
as 2:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Abdul Wai U'Din and Reginald T. Morris
Defendant:
Justin Rester and Jessica O'Keefe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. City of Bossier et al
as 5:2024cv00799
Not Yet Classified:
Police Dept of Bossier City
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Saxton Washington
Defendant:
City of Bossier, Jail of Bossier City, Police Jury Bossier Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00810
Petitioner:
Kameron Hayes
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawdad v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Dentrel Guillory Crawdad
Defendant:
Master Sgt Miller and Lt White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hebert v. Riverbend Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
Randy Hebert
Defendant:
Riverbend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funches v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches and Cecil Leshaun Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
