Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson (ID 44578 ) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2017cv03161
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jefferson
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Patricia Berry, Julie Dockendorff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2016cv03027
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services , Julie Dockendorff , Patricia Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Cole et al
as 5:2014cv03138
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gordon, Sr.
Defendant:
Brian Cole, Timothy Phelps, Eve Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berends v. Shawnee County Jail et al
as 5:2013cv03024
Plaintiff:
Luke Dean Berends
Defendant:
Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hachmeister v. Kline et al
as 5:2012cv03263
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Hachmeister
Defendant:
Richard Kline, Brian Cole, Tim Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foshee v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2012cv03230
Plaintiff:
John Harold Foshee
Defendant:
James Heimgartner, Correct Care Solutions, State Board of Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Denning et al
as 2:2012cv02571
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Cox
Defendant:
Frank Denning , Aramark Food Services , Derrick (lnu) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blake v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv03085
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Ronda Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courter v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2010cv03198
Plaintiff:
Mark Alvin Courter
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Johnson County, Kansas, Johnson County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
