Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Beasley et al v. Office of Violent Sex Offender Management et al
as 4:2013cv01392
Plaintiff:
William Beasley, Charles Wilson, James Atkins and others
Defendant:
Office of Violent Sex Offender Management , Allison Taylor , Lisa Worry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matlock v. Pierson et al
as 6:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
Dekendrick Donte Matlock
Defendant:
Sarah Pierson, John Rupert, Paul Shrode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley et al v. Office of Violent Sex Offender Management et al
as 1:2012cv01165
Plaintiff:
Arturo Abella, Abel Adame, James Atkins and others
Defendant:
Program Specialist Billy Barnes, Dr. Nicholas Edd, Program Specialist Alice Jauregui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkins v. Bradford et al
as 2:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Emmitt Dewayne Atkins
Defendant:
Joseph Bradford, Elias Ybarra, William James and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Szymczak et al
as 4:2012cv01985
Plaintiff:
Willie Atkins
Defendant:
Frank E. Szymczak, David M. Rice, Linda J. Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv02990
Petitioner:
Anthony Atkins
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Atkins v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv01644
Petitioner:
Floyd Atkins
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wade v. The State of Texas - 184th District Court et al
as 4:2008cv02524
Plaintiff:
Glenn R. Wade
Defendant:
The State of Texas - 184th District Court, Jan Krocker, Layne Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Atkins v. The State Courts of Texas
as 4:2007cv02790
Petitioner:
Brian Percell Atkins
Respondent:
The State Courts of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
