Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2009cv03601
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Prison Health Services Inc, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Perez et al
as 1:2008cv04347
Plaintiff:
David A. Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Officer Miller, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McLaughlin v. Freeman et al
as 2:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kevin McLaughlin
Defendant:
Bernard Freeman, Roy Dominguez, Craig Ponton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDonald v. Perez
as 1:2008cv00038
Plaintiff:
DeValius McDonald
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2007cv06565
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Trabula and Sgt. Smith
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Chrissy et al
as 1:2007cv06209
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Chrissy and Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose et al v. Nygren et al
as 3:2007cv50200
Plaintiff:
Xavier S Rose, Xavier S Rose, Xavier S Rose and others
Defendant:
Keith Nygren and Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
Edward Lipscomb, Willie James Gilder, Reginald King and others
Defendant:
Sergeant Brown, Sergeant Hill, Officer Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Perez et al
as 1:2007cv06564
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Lt Carter, John Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 1:2007cv06563
Plaintiff:
Wendell C. Thompson
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
