Cases 31 - 40 of 48
BURNS v. OFFICER C.A. LEONE et al
as 1:2009cv06511
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant:
OFFICER C.A. LEONE, U.S. MARSHALL JOHN DOE #1, U.S. MARSHALL JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Thurmer
as 2:2009cv01149
Petitioner:
Terrance C Burns
Respondent:
Michael Thurmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNS et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2009cv05646
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS, RASHON HIGH and JASON KINDLE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2009cv05370
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant:
ERIC TAYLOR, PIZZARO, FOSSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNS v. TAYLOR
as 1:2009cv05072
Petitioner:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Respondent:
ERIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burns v. Wisconsin Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00540
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Burns
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Of Corrections, Sauk County Jail, Sauk County Jail Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Carter v. Leon Burns, Jr.
as 08-6373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON C. BURNS, JR., Criminal Court Judge, 13th Judicial District of Tennessee, et al
BURNS v. COLE
as 1:2008cv05070
Petitioner:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Respondent:
JUEL E. COLE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BURNS v. COLE et al
as 1:2008cv04843
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant:
JUEL E. COLE, BURLINGTON COUNTY FREEHOLDERS, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BURNS v. COLE et al
as 1:2008cv04807
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. BURNS
Defendant:
JUEL E. COLE, SOCIAL WORKER BROWN, SOCIAL WORKER PEOPLES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
