Cases 31 - 40 of 483
EDWARDS v. WILSON et al
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
WILSON, BERRY, CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTMAN v. CLARK et al
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARTMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN CLARK, FARMER, Dr WALLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. STRAUDER et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
JAKALE ERRION CHANDLER
Defendant:
STRAUDER, DEPUTY WARDEN POWELL and CLARKE COUNTY ATHENS GA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSH v. DOE et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAMAR MARSH
Defendant:
JANE DOE and CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEHEUX v. OLIVER et al
as 7:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
DARIEN JOSEPH MEHEUX
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and JENNIFER CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PAIGE v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 5:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL PAIIGE and NATHANIEL PAIGE
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ROBERT TOOLE, SGT THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCURTY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, aGOVERNOR BRIAN P KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanosdoll v. FCI Jesup
as 2:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
Clark Vanosdoll
Respondent:
Warden FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CASLEBERRY v. EKWINIFE et al
as 5:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
LAMAR DESHAWN CASLEBERRY
Defendant:
DOCTOR DAVID EKWINIFE, WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Jackson
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Gerald Clark
Defendant:
Officer Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
