Cases 31 - 40 of 343
Coleman v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03719
Petitioner:
Jumanne O Coleman
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Nacogdoches County
as 4:2022cv03720
Plaintiff:
Jumanne O Coleman
Defendant:
Nacogdoches County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2022cv02357
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
B. Lumpkin, Jailers, R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02286
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, J Rodriguez, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Christopher Wray, Director Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coleman v. Lumpkin et al.
as 6:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Edward James Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Brown Collions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Edward James Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Brown Collions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Bowers, NFN Wonders, NFN Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv01783
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Bowers, NFN Rodriguez, NFN Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ward et al
as 3:2022cv01361
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
NFN Ward, NFN Simmons, NFN Macedo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
