Cases 31 - 40 of 105
JACKSON v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
JERRY JACKSON
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, POWELL, RUSSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. HUMPHREY
as 5:2012cv00461
Petitioner:
WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
CARL HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAKER v. OWENS et al
as 5:2012cv00459
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, JOHN DOE, CARL HUMPHREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DAVIS
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, JUNE BISHOP and JAMES MCMILLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREEN v. HUMPHREY
as 4:2012cv00269
Petitioner:
ANTHA GREEN
Respondent:
Carl Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREEN v. HUMPHREY
as 5:2012cv00392
Petitioner:
ANTHA GREEN
Respondent:
CARL HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffey v. State of Georgia
as 5:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY COFFEY
Defendant:
STEPHANIE DANIELS, CARL HUMPHREY, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
TONY D THOMPSON
Defendant:
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
LAMARCUS THOMAS
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, WILLIAM POWELL, MCMILLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PROCTOR v. GEORGIA et al
as 5:2012cv00342
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL PROCTOR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
