Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Clark v. Kasich et al
as 4:2016cv02430
Plaintiff:
David E. Clark
Defendant:
John Kasich, Gary Mohr, Mike DeWine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case v. Merlak
as 4:2016cv01531
Petitioner:
Paul Case
Respondent:
Steven Merlak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pullen v. Cool et al
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
William Cool, Cynthia Davis, David Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Killiam et al
as 1:2016cv00606
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Williams
Defendant:
Lt Killiam, Captain Lynch, Sgt Vanbiber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Dana Judd, Donald Morgan, Kathy Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damron v. Donald et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Plaintiff:
Tracy Damron
Defendant:
Morgan Donald, Sgt. Baine, CO Salsbary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
Leroy Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Gary Mohr, Correctional Officer Herren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2013cv00245
Petitioner:
John Frederick Case, II
Respondent:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durham v. Chief Bureau of Classification and Reception et al
as 1:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Roy A. Durham, Jr.
Defendant:
Chief Bureau of Classification and Reception, Warden Warren Correctional Institution, Case Manager Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Cook et al
as 5:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Warden Cook, Inspector Lawerance, Administrator Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
