Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Rankin v. Pearson et al
as 5:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Demetrius S. Rankin
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Leroy Pitts, Arthur Truex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. C.C.A./W.C.C.F. et al
as 5:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
C.C.A./W.C.C.F., J. Banks, G. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Smith et al
as 4:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Vernon Brown
Defendant:
Arthur Smith, James Gillon, Charles Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Epps, et al
as 4:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Dale Caskey, Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Terrell et al
as 4:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Walker
Defendant:
Cynthia Terrell, Charles Smith and Jason Seiger
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Scott et al
as 4:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Robert Scott, Dorthy Jackson, "Unknown" Hayewood and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Caskey et al
as 4:2008cv00073
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Dale Caskey, Clyde Rew, Bart Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crawford v. Reese et al
as 5:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
Scott E. Crawford
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Charles Smith, Angel Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Andrews v. Reece et al
as 5:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamar Andrews
Defendant:
Constance Reece, Charles Smith, Angel Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Champion v. Reece et al
as 5:2007cv00119
Plaintiff:
Gregory Champion
Defendant:
Constance Reece, Charles Smith, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
