Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Seaquist v. Fhuere We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01089
Petitioner: Jeremy Wayne Seaquist
Respondent: Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01068
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDonnell v. Fhuere
as 3:2022cv00909
Defendant: Michael Martin McDonnell
Respondent: Superintendent Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Stay of Execution
Muhammad v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00812
Plaintiff: Tariq Muhammad
Defendant: Colette Peters, Supt. Corey Fuher and C.O. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Willis v. Fhuere We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00613
Petitioner: Robert Willis
Respondent: Superintendent Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00490
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valdez v. Fhuere
as 6:2022cv00442
Petitioner: Pedro Cardenas Valdez
Respondent: Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Fhuere
as 6:2022cv00341
Petitioner: Jo'Nell H. James
Respondent: Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Windham v. Oueno City Jail
as 6:2022cv00248
Petitioner: Corey Eugene Windham
Defendant: Oueno City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windham v. Federal Department of Agriculture
as 6:2022cv00034
Plaintiff: Corey Eugene Windham
Defendant: Federal Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?