Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
KLINGER v. PITKINS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01065
Petitioner: EDWARD F. KLINGER
Respondent: DAVID PITKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF NORTH HAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. PITKINS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00927
Petitioner: ROMONT ALVIN JONES
Respondent: DAVID PITKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chruby v. Kowaleski et al
as 3:2010cv01248
Plaintiff: Walter Chruby
Defendant: Annette Kowaleski, Marge Lechene, Michael Piovarchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Mitchell v. David Pitkins, et al
as 10-2318
Plaintiff - Appellant: DENNIS L. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID PITKINS, DA BUCKS and ATTY GEN PA
Tailey Zeyon v. David Pitkins, et al
as 10-1975
Plaintiff - Appellant: TAILEY S. ZEYON
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID PITKINS, SUPERINTENDENT - COMMONWEALTH OF PA, ATTY GEN PA and DA PHILADELPHIA
Edward Johnson v. David Pitkins, et al
as 10-1782
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID PITKINS, DA MA SUFFOLK and ATTY GEN PA
GOMEZ v. PITKINS et al
as 2:2010cv00955
Petitioner: MARCO GOMEZ
Respondent: DAVID PITKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. PITKINS et al
as 2:2010cv00294
Petitioner: DENNIS L. MITCHELL
Respondent: DAVID PITKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAURA SIEGLE (BUCKS COUNTY) and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baenig v. Pitkins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00114
Petitioner: Charles Baenig
Respondent: David Pitkins and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. PITKINS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04512
Petitioner: EDWARD JOHNSON
Respondent: DAVID PITKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?