Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2016cv05765
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert Tanner, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Lofton et al
as 5:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
Roy McLaughlin, Jr
Defendant:
Judy Lofton, Darell Hamiter, Lonnie Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Edwards et al
as 3:2016cv00165
Defendant:
Robert J. Burns, James T. Dixon, Jr., Jay Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delay v. Werlich et al
as 1:2014cv03422
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cornell Delay
Defendant:
T G Werlich, USA, Ens Legis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eskew v. Rapides Parish et al
as 1:2014cv02621
Plaintiff:
Avery Shawn Eskew
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Rapides Parish, William Hilton, Pinkerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Segrera-Delaespriella v. USA et al
as 2:2014cv02220
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Enrique Segrera-Delaespriella
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Chuck Maiorana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv00553
Defendant:
Jane Does 1 - 10, Jon Does 1 -10, Trish Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv00229
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Jason Coleman, Jason Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Joseph
Interested Party:
William L. Kline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Matthew David Gamble, Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 5:2013cv00698
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell, Darryl Mizell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
