Cases 31 - 40 of 111
McClough v. McKune et al
as 5:2011cv03022
Petitioner:
Mark McClough
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Steven Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompkins v. McKune, et al
as 11-3022
Petitioner - Appellant:
SOLLY M. THOMPKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Young v. McKune et al
as 5:2010cv03247
Petitioner:
Donald C. Young
Respondent:
David R. McKune, Roger Werholtz and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gleason v. McKune et al
as 5:2010cv03200
Petitioner:
Noah J. Gleason
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Strope v. Cummings, et al
as 10-3254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE STROPE, AKA Gordon E. Strope
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM CUMMINGS, Designee, Kansas Department of Corrections, in his individual capacity, DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, K. BECK, Corrections Officer, Lansing Correctional Facility, in her individual capacity and others
Scott v. McKune
as 5:2010cv03095
Petitioner:
Terry L. Scott
Respondent:
David R. McKune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perry v. McKune, et al
as 10-3072
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES PERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden and STEVEN SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Barker v. McKune et al
as 5:2010cv03055
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Barker, Jr.
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Steve Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. McKune et al
as 5:2010cv03042
Petitioner:
Randy R. McGee
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompkins v. McKune et al
as 5:2010cv03016
Petitioner:
Solly M. Thompkins
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
