Cases 31 - 40 of 143
Baskerville v. DeRose et al
as 1:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Carlos Baskerville
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose , Young and Dauphin County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrathers v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Carrathers
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Young, Dominick DeRose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Begnoche, Sr. v. J.T. Haste, et al
as 15-1066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL J. BEGNOCHE, SR., Beghoche a/k/a Begnoche also known as Paul J. Beghoche, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN D.L. DEROSE
Goenaga v. MacDonald et al
as 3:2014cv02496
Plaintiff:
Octavio Goenaga
Defendant:
Steve MacDonald, Lexlucski and D. DeRose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. DeRose et al
as 3:2014cv02425
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Collins
Defendant:
Dommick L. DeRose, Dauphin County Prison and Dauphin County Prison Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green-Bey v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2014cv02379
Petitioner:
Leon Green
Respondent:
United States Of America and Dominick DeRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tyrrell v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2014cv02306
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R Tyrrell
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick DeRose and Dauphin County Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClure v. Haste et al
as 1:2014cv02249
Plaintiff:
Tabu N. McClure
Defendant:
Jeffrey T. Haste, Board of Dauphin County Prison, Unknown # of John Doe's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reilly v. DeRose et al
as 3:2014cv01933
Plaintiff:
Kelli Reilly
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose, Nichols, Mike Welker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. DeRose et al
as 3:2014cv01743
Plaintiff:
Andre J Johnson
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose, Deputy Warden Nichols and Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
