Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Ramirez v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2017cv02750
Plaintiff:
Rodney John Ramirez
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1, John/Jane Doe #2, John/Jane Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfaro v. Ector County Sheriff's Office
as 7:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
George Alfaro
Defendant:
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
Christopher Paul Teague
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castaneda v. San Angelo Police Department et al
as 6:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Ledezma Castaneda
Defendant:
San Angelo Police Department, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuentes v. Rupert et al
as 6:2016cv00778
Plaintiff:
Johnny Fuentes
Defendant:
John Rupert, Jeffery Richardson, Brennan Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. Donaldson et al
as 7:2016cv00036
Defendant:
Jimmy Binga, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Executive Director et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Executive Director, Eddy Wheeler, Formby Unit State Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dean Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Crawford
as 5:2015cv00261
Defendant:
John Doe Aguillone, D. Crawford, John Doe, I and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benavides v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ricky James Benavides
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Putnam v. Traylor et al
as 6:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Putnam
Defendant:
David Traylor, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
