Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Brothern v. Black Hawk County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv03022
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brothern
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Jail, Anthony Thompson, Mark Herbst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Romeo Hardin
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Sheryl Dahm, Nick Ludwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lappe v. Dr. Whitter et al
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Elmer Lappe
Defendant:
Dr. Whitter and John Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hofer v. Iowa Department of Corrections, et al
as 4:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
Roger Allan Hofer
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, IMCC Medical Committee, Frank Fillipelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Hacker et al
as 3:2014cv03077
Plaintiff:
Richard E Miller, Jr
Defendant:
Jana Hacker, Joel Kosinski, Robin Bagby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Iowa Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Cole
Defendant:
Iowa Attorney General, John Burneau and Dr. Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krier v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Sean Edward Krier
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, John Baldwin, John Fayram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. O'Neil et al
as 4:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
Gregory W Thomas
Defendant:
Sean O'Neil, Pradeep Sarswat, Naurang M. Agrawal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mulkey-Bey v. Woodruff et al
as 4:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Floyd Daren Mulkey-Bey
Defendant:
Dr. Woodruff and Des Moines County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardona-Becerra v. McKinney et al--SEE #3 IRO Atty from Mears Law Office to file amended pleadings by 7/23/11 and Pro Se Plaintiff not to file any further pleadings
as 3:2011cv03012
Plaintiff:
Hector Cardona-Becerra
Defendant:
James McKinney and Dr O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
