Cases 31 - 40 of 517
Edwards v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00324
Petitioner:
Antoine Edwards
Respondent:
State of Louisiana, Bradley Scott, Tracey Flemming Davillier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaney v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Chaney
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Wydette Williams and Johnny Hedgemon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahon v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Cody McMahon
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, John Bel Edwards and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Justin J Mark
Defendant:
Edward D. Bickham, Wayne Aucoin, Edward Bickham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Green v. Russ
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Moses Green
Defendant:
Edward Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguillard v. Bickham
as 6:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Teddy Aguillard
Defendant:
Edward Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrett v. Hayes et al
as 5:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Ray Edward Barrett
Defendant:
Samuel Hayes, Daimian McDowell and Supervisor Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Bickham
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson and Edward Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Holden, Col Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Tangipahoa Parish Jail, et al
as 2:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Donald Conley, Jr.
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Jail, Daniel Edwards, Robbie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
