Cases 31 - 40 of 91
De La Cruz v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
as 1:2012cv10010
Plaintiff:
Luis De La Cruz
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, A Amico, Lindsey Olden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commey v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv40164
Plaintiff:
Aaron Commey
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wherry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2011cv40154
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Wherry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wattleton v. Kelly et al
as 4:2010cv40151
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Lynn Kelly and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stierhoff v. Anderson et al
as 1:2010cv11078
Petitioner:
Neil Stierhoff
Respondent:
Erik Anderson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wattleton v. Smith et al
as 4:2010cv40106
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Brian Smith and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joost v. Grondolsky et al
as 4:2010cv40088
Petitioner:
Robert M. Joost
Respondent:
J. Grondolsky and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Grondolsky et al
as 4:2010cv40089
Petitioner:
Joseph B. Young
Respondent:
J. Grondolsky and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burgess v. Grondolsky et al
as 4:2010cv40028
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Burgess
Defendant:
J Grondolsky, FMC, Devens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wattleton v. Amica et al
as 4:2010cv40025
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Amica, Federal Medical Center at Devens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
