Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Frazier v. Washington-Aducci
as 7:2015cv02013
Plaintiff:
Pennie Frazier
Defendant:
Arcola Washington-Aducci, Laconya Williams, Gabriel DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Kinderknect
as 2:2014cv00955
Plaintiff:
John Howard Sherman
Defendant:
Gabriel Kinderknect and Daniel Cecil Partridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel Lopez v. The People Of The State Of California
as 1:2012cv00067
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lopez
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gabriel Lopez v. The People Of The State Of California
as 1:2012cv00065
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lopez
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. USA
as 1:2010cv00242
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rubalcaba v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00714
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rubalcaba
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scaff-Martinez v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00549
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Scaff-Martinez
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, James Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scaff-Martinez v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00558
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Scaff-Martinez
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales-Madera v. Keller (INMATE 3)
as 2:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Morales-Madera
Defendant:
J. A. Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scaff-Martinez v. Reese et al
as 1:2009cv02040
Petitioner:
Gabriel Scaff-Martinez
Respondent:
Constance Reese and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
