Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Gill v. Delaney, Esquire et al
as 1:2018cv02437
Defendant: DOJ, USA Paul E. Budlow, Esquire, USA Julie D. Podlesni, Esquire and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gill v. Budlow et al
as 1:2018cv02401
Defendant: Julie D. Podlesni, Paul E. Budlow and Sean R. Delaney
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gill v. USA - 2255 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01303
Petitioner: Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gill v. Baltimore County Detention et al
as 1:2017cv03095
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant: Warden Baltimore County Detention Center and Paul E. Budlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Law Offices of Murtha, Psoras and Lanasa, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03024
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant: Law Offices of Murtha, Psoras and Lanasa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02287
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. Ahfeldt et al
as 1:2017cv00143
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant: Megan Ahfeldt, Patrick Dugan and Paul E. Budlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Ciambruschini et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant: David Ciambruschini, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk and Julie D. Podlesni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02749
Petitioner: Allen Gill
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gill v. United States Marshal's Services et al
as 1:2016cv02524
Plaintiff: Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant: United States Marshal's Services, S. E Morano, Baltimore Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?