Cases 31 - 40 of 274
Logan v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Orell L. Logan
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, James E. Parks, Ronald Angolone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sprouse v. Jana et al
as 7:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Sprouse
Defendant:
Dr. Timothy Jana, Kaplinger, Brandan Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Angolone et al
as 1:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Orell Logan
Defendant:
Ronald Angolone, Gary Bass, Harold W. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. United States
as 7:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Gary Hancock
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sprouse v. Grim
as 7:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Sprouse
Defendant:
Douglas W. Grim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shortt v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Shortt
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Keen Mountain Correctional Center and Israel Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sprouse v. Grim et al
as 7:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Sprouse
Defendant:
Corporal Douglas W. Grimm, Lieutenant Brad Barker and Corporal Douglas W. Grim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Hutton et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Gary Eugene Small, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher W. Hutton, James Gochenour and Detective Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Schmidt et al
as 7:2021cv00567
Petitioner:
Gary Waller
Respondent:
Major Mike Schmidt and Winston W. Clark, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Motley v. Walrath
as 2:2021cv00549
Plaintiff:
Gary Motley
Defendant:
Mr. J. Walrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
