Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Clifton Sparks v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6571
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFTON I. SPARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Nathan Chambliss v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6513
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHAN CHAMBLISS
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Angelo Irving v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6465
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO MARCELLUS IRVING
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Gregory Wardell Driver v. Harold W. Clarke
as 16-6103
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY WARDELL DRIVER
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Respondent:
BILL WATSON and PORTSMOUTH CIRCUIT COURT
Alfredo Prieto v. Harold Clarke
as 15-7553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFREDO PRIETO
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, EDDIE PEARSON, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison and others
Dartagnan Simmons v. Harold W. Clark
as 15-7361
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARTAGNAN SHALIL SIMMONS
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
David Howell v. Harold Clarke
as 15-7141
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID JUNIOR HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Donald Brooks v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6744
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD LEE BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Roland Boone v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6504
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROLAND LEN BOONE
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
William Newton v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6426
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM TRAVIS NEWTON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
