Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Henderson v. Pulaski County Courthouse
as 5:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Daniel Henderson
Defendant:
Pulaski County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henderson v. Garnett et al
as 1:2011cv00141
Plaintiff:
Develle Henderson
Defendant:
Chad Garnett, David Linley and Starkville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Lee County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Henderson
Defendant:
Lee County Circuit Court, Lee County Circuit Court Clerks Office, Lee County Justice Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. King
as 3:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Henderson
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson, Jr. v. Epps et al
as 2:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
William Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, McDonald, Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Banks v. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 5:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Secretary of the Interior, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Paseb v. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 5:2010cv00165
Defendant:
Secretary of the Interior, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs, Bruce Pearson and others
Plaintiff:
Aiwass Paseb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 5:2010cv00157
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks and Aiwass Paseb
Respondent:
Secretary of the Interior, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Pearson et al
as 5:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Leon Williams, Unknown Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
