Cases 31 - 40 of 432
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Elizabeth W. Canelas, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv04079
Plaintiff:
Demeco Hill
Defendant:
Michael Williams, Tyrone Baker, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Hill
as 3:2023cv01722
Petitioner:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Respondent:
Kathy S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wagner v. Zenn et al
as 3:2023cv50145
Plaintiff:
Terry Ray Wagner and Scanning Dixon
Defendant:
Dr. Zenn, John/Jane Does, Wexford Health Source Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Derenell Hill and Rose Hill
Defendant:
John Idleburg, C. Clouse, C. Crockett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
James L. Gary
Defendant:
USA, Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Flowers v. Lt. Galan et al
as 1:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Frederick Michael Flowers
Defendant:
Lt. Galan, Ms. Hill, Ms. Stott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Mendrick et al
as 1:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hill
Defendant:
James Mendrick, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poor v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
William Poor
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, W. Lawless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2023cv04003
Plaintiff:
Montrell Holmes
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Kurt Osmundson and Henry Hill Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
