Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Holland v. Woods et al
as 1:2011cv01328
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Holland
Defendant:
Kizzie Woods and Sheila Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Easterling et al
as 1:2011cv01299
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Holland
Defendant:
Joseph G. Easterling and Amy Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenz v. Holland
as 3:2010cv00899
Petitioner:
James F. Lorenz
Respondent:
F. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benson v. Hutcherson et al
as 3:2009cv00988
Plaintiff:
Terry Benson
Defendant:
Donald Hutcherson, Linda Moore, Russell Blanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv00565
Plaintiff:
James W. Griffith
Defendant:
Tanya Smith, Flora Jean Holland, Kodihall Channabasappa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madoff v. Barron's dba Barron's.com a/k/a www.Barrons.com, et al
as 4:2009cv00048
Plaintiff:
Bernard Madoff doing business as Jonathan Lee Riches also known as Arthur Nadel and Arthur Nadel
Defendant:
Barron's doing business as Barron's.com also known as www.Barrons.com, Ward S McGuiness, Diane Sipprelle and others
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Dewalt
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fuller v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2009cv00394
Petitioner:
Antonio Fuller
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Flora Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Stipanuk et al
as 1:2009cv01050
Plaintiff:
James (Jim) Wilson
Defendant:
Gerald Stipanuk, Barbara Buford, Patsy Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hardy v. Holland et al
as 3:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Hardy
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Holland and (f/n/u) Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burks v. Holland et al
as 3:2008cv00899
Petitioner:
Anthony N. Burks
Respondent:
F. J. Holland, (f/n/u) Cox, Reginald Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
