Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Perryman v. Corrections Corporation of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00167
Plaintiff: Victor M. Perryman
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, CCA Bonding Company, Gabriel Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2010cv00624
Plaintiff: Scott M. Holmes
Defendant: Donnie Rutledge, Lora Cole, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
as 3:2010cv00614
Plaintiff: Scott M. Holmes
Defendant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
as 2:2010cv00308
Plaintiff: Scott M. Holmes
Defendant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holmes v. King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00151
Petitioner: James Earl Holmes
Respondent: Ronald King and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Epps et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00230
Plaintiff: Jasper Hall
Defendant: Christopher Epps, CMCF - Medical Administrator, Willie March and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. USA
as 2:2009cv00218
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Dennis Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dixon v. Holmes
as 2:2008cv00170
Plaintiff: Kenneth Dixon
Defendant: Jason Holmes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Mississippi Department of Corrections Parole Board
as 3:2008cv00113
Plaintiff: Keith Lemond Holmes
Defendant: Mississippi Department of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2008cv00027
Plaintiff: Theodore Mayes
Defendant: State of Mississippi, Department of Corrections, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?