Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Harris et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06779
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-10, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Phillipe Berkowitz, Tyran Trotter, Joel Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03701
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Foskey v. Northrup et al
as 9:2020cv00504
Plaintiff:
Donneil Foskey
Defendant:
Correction Officer Newcome, Correction Officer Campbell, Correction Officer Coleslaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winnie v. Durant et al
as 9:2020cv00502
Defendant:
Durant and John Does #1-10
Plaintiff:
Mackenzie Winnie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazyck v. Keller et al
as 6:2020cv06055
Defendant:
Sergeant Berghorn, Sergeant Issac, Officer John Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Mazyck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus v. Howard et al
as 1:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Thomas Dina, John Does 1-10, County of Erie and others
Plaintiff:
Felippe Marcus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2019cv07317
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lisi
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1 - #10, Department of Justice, XYZ Entities #1 - #10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazyck v. Keller et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Defendant:
Sergeant Berghorn, Sergeant Issac, Officer John Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Mazyck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazurkiewicz v. Howard et al
as 1:2019cv01584
Defendant:
Thomas Diina, Timothy B. Howard, Erie County Holding Center and others
Plaintiff:
James R Mazurkiewicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
