Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 118
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01199
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01208
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01200
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01209
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01205
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01201
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01207
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01210
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHRISMAN v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01130
Petitioner: KEVIN DOUGLAS CHRISMAN
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RYKARD v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01109
Petitioner: PAUL RYKARD
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?