Cases 31 - 40 of 1,358
White v. Howard County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jim Bob White
Defendant:
Howard County Sheriffs Office, Simon Munoz, John Doe 1:24-cv-00069 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Sheriff Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, FNU Arrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Hedrick
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Robert Darling, Jeremy Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancoch and Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
Jane Doe, FNU Kinnedy, Vannesa LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe and Table Company in TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
