Cases 31 - 40 of 1,678
Jones v. Via Path Communication et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Via Path Communication, CDCR Office of Grievances, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Thomas Cruz v. Gena Jones et al.
as 2:2024cv00410
Petitioner:
Brian Thomas Cruz
Respondent:
Acting Warden Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Harris v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
S Rodriguez, Anya, M. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larkin v. Cabraser et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Billy F. Larkin
Defendant:
Elizabeth J. Cabraser, Krsitopher S. Ritter, Stephen J. Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) TerVeer v. Shazaad et al
as 2:2023cv03047
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
Shazaad, Mehari, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Campbell v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Campbell
Defendant:
Ruiz and Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jacques v. Jung et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Jung, B. Jones and Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Derek Steven McCormack
Defendant:
Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Boulden et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Dyrell Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Boulden, Krosten, Layrana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jar'vell Jones v. Danny Posadas et al
as 5:2023cv02582
Plaintiff:
Jar'vell Jones
Defendant:
Danny Posadas, Fidencio Carlos and Steven Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
