Cases 31 - 40 of 1,922
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hillman v. Hillman et al
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Hillman
Defendant:
Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Benton et al
as 6:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Marion Leroy Jones
Defendant:
I. Benton, Unknown Lofton, Unknown Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rios v. Meyer et al
as 5:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Brent Meyer, Wanda Mason, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Norman
as 3:2023cv02787
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Jones
Defendant:
Brad Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones, III v. Muniz et al
as 9:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Donald Muniz, Dwight Blackshire, Gabrielle Lovelady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, III v. Back et al
as 9:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
J. Back, J. Burleyson, Christopher A. Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, III v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Spurlock, Sarah Horace, Robert L. Tanner, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
