Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Juarez-Morales v. Kane
as 2:2007cv02062
Petitioner:
Sergio Juarez-Morales
Respondent:
Katrina Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jaime v. Kane
as 2:2007cv02025
Petitioner:
Reinaldo Carrillo Jaime
Respondent:
Katrina Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kianersiadegani v. Kane et al
as 2:2007cv02024
Petitioner:
Naser Kianersiadegani
Respondent:
Katrina Kane, ICE and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chhoun v. Kane
as 2:2007cv02023
Petitioner:
Chanthoeurn Chhoun
Respondent:
Katrina Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Muhammad v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv01841
Plaintiff:
Saber Muhammad
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Katrina Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01823
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miguel-Miguel v. Kane et al
as 2:2007cv01815
Petitioner:
Diego Miguel-Miguel
Respondent:
Katrina Kane, David A Kollus, Julie L Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Osmancevic v. Kane
as 2:2007cv01792
Petitioner:
Fikret Osmancevic
Respondent:
Katrina Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bou v. Kane
as 2:2007cv01764
Petitioner:
Bunly Bou
Respondent:
Katrina Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alzerjawi v. Kane et al
as 2:2007cv01743
Petitioner:
Settar Mohsin Alzerjawi
Respondent:
Katrina Kane and Dave Kollus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
