Cases 31 - 40 of 109
Cros-Toure v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01259
Petitioner:
Denise Cros-Toure
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez-Marquez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01209
Petitioner:
Karina Hernandez-Marquez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alcocer-Cordoba v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01168
Petitioner:
Juana Idalia Alcocer-Cordoba
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cisneros v. Neeley
as 7:2023cv01165
Petitioner:
Fabiola Perez Cisneros
Respondent:
Kimberly Neeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Heck v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01147
Petitioner:
Kristen Raelyn Heck
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez-Gonzalez v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Izamary Esmerald Ramirez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ellis v. DeSantis et al
as 7:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Priscilla A Ellis
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01025
Petitioner:
Naomi Natal Haynes
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howell v. Kimberly
as 1:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
Derrick Lashon Howell
Respondent:
Melissa Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quinones v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00894
Petitioner:
Martha Quinones
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
