Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Bishop v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Merel Evans Bishop
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tallman v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Leslie L. Tallman
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckman v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eckman
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Governor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Swanson et al
as 0:2011cv03737
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Swanson et al
as 0:2011cv03712
Plaintiff:
Eugene Christopher Banks
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karsjens et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2011cv03659
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Karsjens , David LeRoy Gamble , Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Hammon et al
as 0:2011cv03497
Plaintiff:
Maurice Harris
Defendant:
Laurie Hammon, Debbie Cole, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. Jesson et al
as 0:2011cv03429
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elmer Wills
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krych v. DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants et al
as 0:2011cv03091
Plaintiff:
Chris Krych
Defendant:
DHS MSOP-ML, April 6, 2011, Client Placement Committee members and participants, Kent Johansen, Barbara Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaulieu v. Jesson et al
as 0:2011cv02755
Plaintiff:
Wallace James Beaulieu
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
