Cases 31 - 40 of 796
Martin v. Strange
as 3:2023cv05039
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05008
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Perez
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Karie Rainer, Traci Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LoRusso v. Starbucks Company
as 2:2022cv01770
Plaintiff:
Michael LoRusso
Defendant:
Starbucks Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Esparza v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv05961
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Esparza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kaiser v. Herrington et al
as 3:2022cv05944
Plaintiff:
Michael Cole Kaiser
Defendant:
Ryan Herrington, Danee Young, Eran Lystad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Taylor et al
as 2:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gonzales
Defendant:
Edward Taylor, Damian Spicer and Michael Schork
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Sparber
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
Luis Andre Perez and Andre Perez
Respondent:
State of Washington and Michael Sparber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Powell v. Rite Aid Pharmacy et al
as 2:2022cv01324
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lenorda Powell, II
Defendant:
Rite Aid Pharmacy, Jordan Westergreen, Alden Ngel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magana v. Haynes
as 3:2022cv05682
Petitioner:
Xavier Michael Magana
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts et al
as 2:2022cv01095
Petitioner:
Michael E Jackson
Respondent:
Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts, Twin Falls County Jail and Ivy Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
