Cases 31 - 40 of 203
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
MUNIZ v. RICCI et al
as 3:2012cv07596
Petitioner:
FRANKY MUNIZ
Respondent:
MICHELE RICCI and NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Caines v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-4205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NICHOLAS KARIM CAINES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Anthony Gould v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-3727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. GOULD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, Administrator and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Gregory Bartholomew v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-3544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY J. BARTHOLOMEW
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Johnnie Davenport v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-3351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNIE DAVENPORT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Joseph Baker v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
LEHMANN v. NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2012cv04433
Plaintiff:
FRED S. LEHMANN
Defendant:
NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL RECEPTION AND ASSIGNMENT FACILITY, BRUCE A. HAUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Smith v. George Hayman, et al
as 12-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Corrections (NJDOC), MICHELLE RICCI, Administrator of New Jersey State Prison (NJSP), RUSTY REEVES, Doctor, Director of Psychiatry and others
Angelo Burgos v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 12-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO BURGOS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
