Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Miller v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv00262
Petitioner:
John E. Miller
Respondent:
Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Little et al
as 1:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
John E. Miller
Defendant:
Michael Little, Timothy Martin, Brian Engrem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2012cv01115
Petitioner:
Derek William Miller
Respondent:
State Of Delaware, Phil Morgan and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shah v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv01182
Plaintiff:
Kushal Kalpan Shah
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Stan Taylor, Mary Miller Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Attorney General Office of Delaware et al
as 1:2011cv01125
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Miller
Defendant:
Attorney General Office of Delaware, Beau Biden, James Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2011cv00984
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven P. Wood, Diane C. Walsh, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Biden et al
as 1:2011cv00707
Plaintiff:
Lenard Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, III, Brendan O'Neill and Lisa M. Schwind
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Coning et al
as 1:2011cv00377
Plaintiff:
John E. Miller
Defendant:
Christine Coning, Blake Warnick, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Attorney General of the State of Delaware et al
as 1:2010cv00779
Petitioner:
William C. Miller, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Delaware Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schoolfield v. Deloy et al
as 1:2010cv00410
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Schoolfield
Defendant:
Michael Deloy, Angus MacLennan, Veronica Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
