Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Macias v. Chung et al
as 6:2015cv00910
Plaintiff:
Albert Macias
Defendant:
Courtney Chung, Douglas . Green, Theodore Nagiotis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macias v. Chandler
as 4:2015cv00736
Petitioner:
Hector Daniel Macias
Respondent:
Rodney W Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maldonado v. Macias et al
as 3:2015cv00221
Respondent:
Don Franklin, Jeh C. Johnson, Loretta E. Lynch and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Efrain Chavez Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Macias-Ochoa v. USA
as 5:2015cv00163
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Abraham Macias-Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Krishnamoorthy v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00157
Respondent:
Alfredo Campos, Jeh Johnson, Adrian Macias and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Samydass M. Krishnamoorthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez-Macias v. United States of America
as 7:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramirez-Macias
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Macias v. Wiles et al
as 3:2015cv00108
Defendant:
Deputy Beard, Chacon and Richard D. Wiles
Plaintiff:
Christopher Macias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sydathong v. Macias et al
as 3:2015cv00089
Respondent:
Alfredo Campos, Jeh Johnson and Adrian Macias
Petitioner:
Phonesy Sydathong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Macias v. Cunningham
as 1:2014cv01136
Defendant:
Officer Shane Cunningham
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Macias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias Munoz v. United States Of America
as 3:2014cv00398
Petitioner:
Jesus Gregorio Macias Munoz
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
