Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Lee v. Proland Management
as 6:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
Kum Nam Lee
Defendant:
Proland Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrington v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Tavares L. Farrington
Defendant:
Officer Harper, Lieutenant Cordero, Lieutenant Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lee v. Proland Management
as 6:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Kum Nam Lee
Defendant:
Proland Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrington v. Harper et al
as 5:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Tavares L. Farrington
Defendant:
Officer Harper, D.H.O. Carol, Assistant Warden Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crosby v. Centurion of Florida et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Otis Crosby, Jr.
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, Michelle Daniels, Sgt. Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar v. FCC Coleman II USP et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jean Erole Oscar and ZB
Defendant:
FCC Coleman II USP, FNU Kasmuke, United States of America and others
Respondent:
FNU Wegner and FNU Clemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Joseph v. Scille et al
as 9:2022cv80392
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Joseph
Defendant:
Patrice A. Scille, West Palm Beach Police and Manager of Redlobster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Medical Nurse et al
as 2:2021cv14281
Plaintiff:
Michael Liveal Scott
Defendant:
Medical Nurse, CMI Manager, Sgt Kete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMM v. WARDEN et al
as 4:2021cv00207
Defendant:
Canteen Manager, Property Staff, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ERIC LAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamm v. Warden et al
as 3:2021cv00509
Defendant:
Canteen Manager, Property Staff, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Eric Lamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
