Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Underwood v. Hawk et al
as 3:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Underwood
Defendant:
Sharon Hawk, Andrew Pazera, Maria Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Hawk et al
as 3:2016cv00837
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Underwood
Defendant:
Sharon Hawk, Andrew Pazera, Maria Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Hawk et al
as 3:2016cv00811
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Underwood
Defendant:
Sharon Hawk, Andrew Pazera, Maria Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Young, Jr. v. Mike Scott, et al
as 16-15762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GEORGE YOUNG, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE SCOTT, Sheriff, FNU ELLENGOOD, Chief, THOMAS EBERHARDT and others
Young et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
Michael George Young, Jr., Steven Tompkins, Rodney Dickerson and others
Defendant:
Mike Scott, FNU Ellengood, Thomas Eberhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Huapilla et al
as 2:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Taylor Martin
Defendant:
Miguel Huapilla , Dayton Gaston , Joseph Peaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00474
Plaintiff:
Rondan Keith
Defendant:
Mike Scott, FNU Trebino, FNU Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schein v. Lee County Florida Sheriff et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
R. Mark Schein
Defendant:
Lee County Florida Sheriff, Mike Scott, Armour Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael George Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Scott, Thomas Eberhart, James Baracco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Underwood
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Sharon Hawk, Andrew Pazera and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
