Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Moody v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
as 1:2012cv00576
Plaintiff:
Donald Moody, Sr
Defendant:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Clark et al
as 4:2012cv03358
Plaintiff:
Steven Moody
Defendant:
Sergeant Clark, Sergeant Davis, Sergeant Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodruff v. Walls et al
as 7:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin Woodruff
Defendant:
Bryan Walls, Tommy Martin, B.J. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Thaler
as 1:2011cv00237
Petitioner:
Donald Moody
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moody v. Livingston et al
as 6:2010cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kalan Moody
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Todd Foxworth and Jerrie M Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Taylor et al
as 4:2010cv02032
Plaintiff:
Steven Craig Moody
Defendant:
Ronnie Taylor, W.R. Laws, CSD Sprint Telephone Relay Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
as 1:2010cv00275
Petitioner:
Donald Moody, Sr
Respondent:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Harrison County Jail et al
as 2:2009cv00305
Plaintiff:
Paul C Ward
Defendant:
Harrison County Jail, W T McCool, FNU Bounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. USA
as 4:2009cv00561
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Louis Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Moody v. Boyce
as 6:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Moneke Danyell Moody
Defendant:
Dennis Boyce
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
