Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Richards v. Abangan et al
as 3:2015cv00516
Plaintiff: James Richards
Defendant: Roland Abangan, Unknown Little, Norris Hogans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooghe v. Hogan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00117
Petitioner: Thomas Hooghe
Respondent: Norris Hogan and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laphand v. Hogans et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00482
Plaintiff: Damian Laphand
Defendant: Norris Hogans, Warren and Vest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooghe v. Hogan et al
as 3:2015cv00082
Petitioner: Thomas Hooghe
Respondent: Norris Hogan and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sonnier v. Hogan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00370
Plaintiff: Joseph Dale Sonnier
Defendant: Norris Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dukes v. Hogan et al
as 3:2015cv00327
Plaintiff: Kelvin Dukes
Defendant: Norris Hogan, Rolando Abangan, Kevin Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Hogan et al
as 3:2015cv00328
Plaintiff: Michael Dean Carroll
Defendant: Norris Hogan, Mr. Thomas, L. Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 3:2015cv00310
Plaintiff: Gentry T. Smith
Defendant: James Alexander, Management Training Corporation, Mathew Naidow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00101
Plaintiff: Zachary Johnson
Defendant: Christopher B. Epps, Johnnie Denmark, Mary Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hogan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00008
Petitioner: Latitus Jones
Respondent: Norris Hogan, State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?