Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Oakley v. Evans et al
as 3:2014cv03044
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Oakley
Defendant:
Evans, Candice Cain, Lt. B and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman v. Acuff et al
as 3:2014cv00066
Petitioner:
Terence Neil Spearman
Respondent:
Damon Acuff, Jeh Johnson, John Sandweg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ackerman v. French et al
as 1:2013cv01595
Plaintiff:
Neil Ackerman
Defendant:
G French, Kevin DeLong and J Starkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mueller v. Williamson et al
as 3:2013cv03344
Plaintiff:
Daniel Phillip Mueller
Defendant:
Neil Williamson, Terry Durr, Brenda James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofquist v. Nwaobasi
as 3:2013cv00835
Plaintiff:
Neil Lofquist
Defendant:
Dr Nwaobasi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv05435
Plaintiff:
Craig Armstrong
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Gladye Taylor, Keith Anglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Schneider et al
as 3:2013cv03183
Plaintiff:
Emanuel W Hayes
Defendant:
Thomas P Schneider, Neil Williamson and Terry Durr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupree v. Clemons et al
as 3:2013cv03177
Plaintiff:
David Louis Dupree
Defendant:
Gregory Clemons, Neil M Williamson, Lisa K Mercier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatch v. Walton
as 3:2013cv00247
Petitioner:
Russel Neil Gatch
Respondent:
Jeffrey S Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rentfro et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv02056
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Rentfro , Sherwin Savage , Robert Hendricks and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael Puisis, Louis Schicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
