Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 190
Henriquez v. Commissioner of New York City
as 13-1450
Petitioner - Appellant: Michael Henriquez
Respondent - Appellee: Commissioner of New York City Department of Corrections, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services and New York State Attorney General
Murray v. Tulip
as 13-1430
Plaintiff - Appellant: James O. Murray, III
Defendant - Appellee: T. Arquitt, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, individual and official capacity, Norman Bezio, Director Special Housing, Inmate Disciplinary Programs, New York State Department of Correctional Services, individual and official capacity, B. Bogett, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, individual and official capacity and others
Isasi v. Attorney General of the United
as 13-1400
Plaintiff - Appellant: Richard Isasi
Defendant - Appellee: Attorney General of the United States of America, State of New York's Governor's, Queens County District Attorney and others
McAllister v. Fischer
as 13-1111
Plaintiff - Appellant: Charles McAllister, AKA Charles McCallister
Defendant - Appellee: Brian Fischer, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Lucien Leclaire, Deputy Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Patricia LeConey, Superintendent, Cape Vincent Correctional Facility and others
A'Gard v. Perez
as 13-697
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kenith A'Gard
Defendant - Appellee: Correctional Officer V. Sanin, at Downstate Correctional Facility, in his official capacity, in his individual capacity, Sergeant Candidus, Area Supervisor at Downstate Correctional Facility, in her official capacity, in her individual capacity, Correctional Officer John Doe, at Downstate Correctional Facility, in his official capacity, in his individual capacity and others
Henriquez v. Commissioner of New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv01279
Petitioner: Michael Henriquez
Respondent: Commissioner of New York City Department of Corrections, Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services and New York State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Candelaria v. Higley
as 13-374
Plaintiff - Appellant: Juan Candelaria
Defendant: Girard P. Monahan, DOCS Deputy Superintendent for Security at Wende, Randall G. Ziolkowski, DOCS Lieutenant, Conrad K. Walter, DOCS Lieutenant and others
Defendant - Appellee: Laurence J. Higley, G. Monahan, Robert A. Kirkpatrick, DBA Wende Correctional Facility and others
Mitchell v. New York State Department of C
as 12-5087
Plaintiff: Prisoners of the State of New York, Prisoners of the State of New York at Southport Correctional Facility, Prisoners of the State of New York that are practicing members of the Nation of Islam and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Dontie S. Mitchell, and those similarly situated
Defendant: New York State Department of Correctional Services
Defendant - Appellee: Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Michael McGinnis, Superintendent, Cieslak, Supervisor of the Southport Correctional facility Imate Grievance Program and others
Isasi v. Attorney General of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv06181
Defendant: Attorney General of the United States, New York State Department of Correctional Service, Queens County District Attorney and others
Plaintiff: Richard Isasi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Fischer
as 12-4917
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carlos Rivera
Defendant: James Berbary, Superintendent, Collin Correctional Facility, K. Bellamy, Beuaway, Inmate Grievance Program Central Office Review Committee, DOCS and others
Defendant - Appellee: M. Kinderman, Acting Superintendent, Marcy Correctional Facility

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?