Cases 31 - 40 of 570
Proctor v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Proctor
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, United States of America and Grady County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6095
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Rigsby v. Corder, et al
as 23-7048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. CORDER, CPL. HAYES, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Campbell v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
Michael A Campbell
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnett v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Joshua C Arnett
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, David W Prater, Cameron M Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Jerome Adrian David
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strange v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Robert Joe Strange
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Martinez v. Farris
as 23-6001
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICA ALEXANDER MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM FARRIS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Loveless v. Peek et al
as 5:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Chris Elroy Loveless
Defendant:
Jim Peek, Jason M Hicks and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
