Cases 31 - 40 of 139
PETERSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2019cv04442
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
JOE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkland v. Danzig et al
as 8:2019cv01907
Defendant:
FNU Hammack, FNU Belton, FNU Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. INCH
as 1:2019cv00120
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PETERSON
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Inch et al
as 3:2019cv00319
Defendant:
B. Roberts, K.N. Box, Felicia D. Chestnut and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2019cv00987
Petitioner:
Charles C. Peterson
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv20558
Defendant:
Centurion Health Resources Inc., Nurse Peterson, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jerald Gene Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv20141
Defendant:
Assistant Warden of Programs, Mr. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv20142
Defendant:
G. Morris, Mr. Jones, Ms. Hockaday and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2018cv00197
Defendant:
L PETERSON, JULIE L JONES, M JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK A GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. JONES et al
as 5:2018cv00183
Defendant:
D W MADDOX, L PETERSON, JULIE L JONES and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK A GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
