Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01339
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Orr v. Peterson et al
as 3:2014cv00898
Defendant:
S. Neely and Derrick Peterson
Plaintiff:
Corwin Delano Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Peterson et al
as 3:2014cv00833
Defendant:
Darlene Felix, Mark Hale-Brown, Derrick Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Corwin Delano Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2013cv01875
Defendant:
Ms. Joan Barton, Greg Jones, Capt. Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Demetris Gibson, Telly Alexander Heath and Raul Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mabe v. Marion County Sheriffs Office et al
as 6:2013cv01013
Defendant:
Ryan Dunbar, Curtis Henckel, Jerry Hogue and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Willard Mabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galligar v. Nooth et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Defendant:
Adam Abell, Joe Bugher, Randy Butts and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur John Galligar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Franke et al
as 3:2011cv00272
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Alleman, Lt. Boston, James Deacon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anello et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv00622
Plaintiff:
Aaron Alexander Anello
FNU:
Cpl. Fugate, Sgt. Mena and Capt. Peterson
Defendant:
M. Nooth, C.O. Rux and Max Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Thomas
as 3:2009cv00163
Petitioner:
Milton Robert Peterson
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Callicott v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2008cv00341
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Callicott
Defendant:
Clackamas County, Lynn Peterson, Bill Kennemer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
