Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Blackston v. Gerand et al
as 8:2017cv02067
Plaintiff:
Brian Blackston
Defendant:
Gerand, Coker and North Eastern District Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Rogers et al
as 8:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Tutankhamun Holt
Defendant:
Michael J. Rogers, Amy Kay Brizenoine, Baker & Tisdale, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. United States Marshal's Services et al
as 1:2016cv02524
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Services, S. E Morano, Baltimore Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. Warden et al
as 8:2016cv01571
Petitioner:
Jeffery Osborne
Respondent:
Warden, ., Baltimore County D A Office, Baltimore County Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. Westminister Police Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv00353
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Graham
Defendant:
Westminister Police Dept., Valentine and Jedowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Beaver et al
as 1:2014cv04035
Plaintiff:
Robert Lowe
Defendant:
Brian Beaver, David Underwood and Salisbury Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Salisbury City Police Dept. et al
as 8:2014cv03487
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Smith
Defendant:
Salisbury City Police Dept., Officer J. Anita #1180, PFC J. Sander #1122 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicks v. Walmart Dept. Stores et al
as 1:2014cv02293
Plaintiff:
David Bryant Wicks
Defendant:
Walmart Dept. Stores, Justin Sherman, Mike White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Montgomery County et al
as 8:2013cv03477
Plaintiff:
Stefan Fields
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Montgomery County Police Dept. and C. Brodzinskic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Baltimore City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2013cv02933
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jackson
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police Dept., Lamaire Byfield, Gary Galing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
